Navigation
Main page
Author's
kit
Registration
Program
Organization
Venue
More information
wcsb06@cs.tut.fi
Hosted by
TUT CSB group
|
|
Fourth International Workshop on
Computational Systems Biology,
WCSB 2006
June
12-13, 2006
Tampere, Finland
|
|
Abstract --- Maria G. Samsonova,
Department of Computational Biology,
St.Petersburg State Polytechnical University, Russia
Analysis of morphome information
To characterize the development in the morphogenetic field controlling
Drosophila segmentation we take a systems biology approach by combining
high-precision assay of gene expression with statistical analysis and
mathematical modeling [1-3]. For several years we have worked at testing the
hypothesis that segmental architecture is determined by a regulatory cascade
of transcription factors expressed from segmentation genes. This hypothesis
is assumed to be true by Drosophila research community, and is consonant
with the results of our own earlier work [3,4]. However, recently the
generality of this idea has been called into a question by a study [5]
demonstrating that the accuracy of segment determination may not directly
controlled by the regulatory cascade of segmentation genes. This result is
itself a special instance of a general phenomenon, evident in our own data,
in which highly variable early expression patterns become extremely uniform
across embryos when the time of critical determination events arrives. In
this talk I will discuss the mechanism and precision of pattern formation,
as well as buffering mechanisms compensating for variation in segmentation
gene expression.
References:
1. E. Myasnikova, A. Samsonova, K. Kozlov, M. Samsonova, and J. Reinitz
(2001a).
Registration of the expression patterns of Drosophila segmentation genes by
two independent
methods. Bioinformatics, 17:3-12.
2. E. Myasnikova, A. Samsonova, M. Samsonova, and J. Reinitz (2002). Support
vector
regression applied to the determination of the developmental age of a
Drosophila embryo
from its segmentation gene expression patterns. Bioinformatics, 18
Suppl1:S87-S95.
3. J. Jaeger, S. Surkova, M. Blagov, H. Janssens, D. Kosman, K. N. Kozlov,
Manu, E.
Myasnikova, C. E. Vanario-Alonso, M. Samsonova, D. H. Sharp, and J. Reinitz
(2004a).
Dynamic control of positional information in the early Drosophila embryo.
Nature, 430:368-
371.
4. J. Jaeger, M. Blagov, D. Kosman, K N. Kozlov, Manu, E. Myasnikova, S.
Surkova, C E.
Vanario-Alonso, M. Samsonova, D H. Sharp, and J. Reinitz (2004b). Dynamical
analysis of
regulatory interactions in the gap gene system of Drosophila melanogaster.
Genetics,
167:1721-1737.
5. B. Houchmandzadeh, E. Wieschaus, and S. Leibler (2002). Establishment of
developmental
precision and proportions in the early drosophila embryo. Nature, 415:798-802
|
|