Korpela's 42 Laws about Usenet
- Asking in a wrong group is not guaranteed to result in
flames only; you will also get wrong answers.
- If a message does not get to the point in the first sentence,
there's probably no point to get to.
- If a message begins with addressing an individual, it was
probably not worth sending by E-mail either.
- If a signature is longer than four lines, the content before it
is probably even more boring than the signature.
- The standard way to start an obfuscating article is
"Let's make things clear".
- On the average, Usenet cannot be much more than average
postings by average people; optimists think that it need not be
signicantly less.
-
If a message has been sent to more than one group, the odds are
that none of the groups is the right one.
- Any group reorganization intended to keep disturbing people away
will attract them.
- There are two ways to learn how Usenet works: by getting flamed,
and by looking at others getting flamed.
- It is generally impossible, and quite unnecessary, to
distinguish trolling from deep stupidity.
- Silence is golden, especially when you have nothing to say.
- Usenet is British and not French as regards to politeness:
it is not impolite to let discussion drop, it is impolite to make
it go on after everything has been said.
- On Usenet, parodies fail, because Usenet itself is a parody.
- Any attempt to convey a message by telling a joke is doomed;
jokes can be fun, at most.
- You won't be taken seriously, unless you are humorous once in a while.
- Declaring victory is effective in Usenet discussions; but
it makes the opponent a winner.
- Advertizing works on Usenet; but the effect is opposite
to the intended one.
- "I just found..." usually means that someone thought he found
a clever way to advertize.
- FREE things aren't.
- Telling your real name in the From line helps in
not revealing too much about yourself.
- Address munging may or may not reduce the spam you get;
it surely reduces the number of useful answers you get.
- Comprehensive quoting indicates lack of comprehensive reading.
- Posting a question that has been answered in a FAQ
will normally result in six
replies from people who failed to check it, too.
- People who post bogus answers seldom bother adding a FAQ reference,
or any reference.
- You need to be an expert to recognize expert advice, but
distinguishing nonsense from serious attempts is usually simple, once
you know how Usenet works.
- Experts digress, too, but only after solving the problem or proving
it to be unsolvable.
- Anything you ask is just an incentive to others to make some vaguely
related comments; but their comments might not actually be related to
what you asked.
- Usenet is one of the quickiest ways of getting yourself misunderstood
worldwide.
- There's no such thing as explaining things too simply on Usenet.
- Usenet punctuation uses two or more consecutive exclamation marks (!!)
to indicate that there is nothing surprising or of great interest being said.
- Usenet punctuation uses two or more consecutive question marks (??)
to indicate lack of any question worth answering.
- Usenet punctuation uses three dots (...) to indicate that the poster does
not know what to say but says it anyway.
- All capitals means you want capital from others for nothing.
- All lower case means your case couldn't have lower value.
(Note: This law 34 should not be confused
with rule 34.)
- There are no simple questions, just people who forgot
to ask their real question.
- A quick question is one that was formulated
quickly, thus greatly increasing
the time needed for getting a useful answer.
- Old threads never die; they just fade away.
- The only way to help a heated discussion is to stay away from it.
-
Any Usenet message longer than 100 lines is probably spam or piece of ugly flame war, though at times it could be just a pointless bulk of irrelevant data or a most boring monologue.
(This used to be:
"The number of people who read a message is inversely
proportional to its length.")
- The probability of getting your message through is inversely
proportional to the number of times you post it.
- When the same questions are raised over and over again,
every round introduces new disinformation.
- The average usefulness of a thread is inversely
proportional to the cube of the number of groups it is posted to.
On 2002-02-04 I wrote, in a response to a crossposted article,
an article where I mentioned Korpela's 42nd law,
and I was
asked where the rest are.
So I had to invent write them down.
This document is part of
my material about Usenet,
which contains
a list of recommended further reading about Usenet.